Migration to the Main Board is the process by which a company listed on a Small and Medium Enterprises (SME) Exchange seeks transfer of its securities to the Main Board of a recognized stock exchange such as BSE or NSE. This transition is carefully regulated by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) and governed by the specific listing requirements of the concerned exchanges. The objective behind migration is to provide eligible companies with a wider platform to raise funds, attract institutional investors, and improve overall visibility in the securities market, thereby enabling them to compete on par with larger and more established players. It is considered a natural progression for enterprises that have successfully achieved business stability, demonstrated consistent growth, and are now prepared for the enhanced compliance standards and scrutiny of the Main Board. From a legal perspective, the migration framework is expressly recognized under the SEBI (Issue of Capital and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2018, which prescribe eligibility and disclosure requirements, and the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015, which impose governance, reporting, and disclosure standards. Further, the stock exchanges issue circulars and operational guidelines from time to time to streamline the process, provide procedural clarity, and ensure that only compliant, financially sound, and credible entities are permitted to access the Main Board.
Enhanced Market Visibility
One of the most significant advantages of migration to the Main Board is the increase in market visibility. Unlike SME platforms, which primarily attract limited participation from retail investors and small institutions, the Main Board is closely monitored by analysts, fund managers, institutional investors, and the financial press. This heightened visibility creates better awareness of the company’s business operations, financial performance, and growth prospects. It also allows the company to be compared with established industry peers, thus strengthening its competitive position. Over time, improved recognition in the broader investment community contributes to higher demand for the company’s securities.
Access to Capital
The Main Board provides a wider and more flexible platform for raising capital through various instruments such as public issues, rights issues, qualified institutional placements (QIPs), and preferential allotments. Institutional investors, including mutual funds, venture capitalists, foreign institutional investors (FIIs), and insurance companies, generally prefer investing in Main Board companies due to the liquidity and governance standards mandated by SEBI. This enhanced access to capital ensures that businesses can raise larger amounts of equity to fund expansion projects, modernize infrastructure, or undertake acquisitions. Thus, migration directly supports the long-term growth and diversification strategies of a company.
Improved Liquidity
Liquidity refers to the ease with which shares can be bought or sold without causing significant changes in the stock price. On SME exchanges, trading volumes are often thin, leading to lower liquidity and wide bid-ask spreads. Migration to the Main Board addresses this issue by providing exposure to a larger pool of active traders and institutional participants. Higher trading volumes ensure efficient price discovery and stability in share prices, which, in turn, instills confidence in existing and prospective investors. For shareholders, this improved liquidity means they can realize the value of their investments more easily, making the company’s securities more attractive in the secondary market.
Valuation and Reputation
Migration to the Main Board often results in enhanced valuations for the company’s securities. This is largely due to the increased participation of institutional investors who apply rigorous standards of due diligence and governance before investing. As the company aligns itself with stricter disclosure requirements and governance norms under SEBI’s LODR Regulations, it builds a reputation for transparency, accountability, and ethical management practices. The combination of higher governance standards and institutional trust typically leads to better valuation multiples, benefiting both the company and its shareholders. Furthermore, the elevated reputation of being a Main Board listed company strengthens the company’s brand among customers, vendors, and other stakeholders, creating an ecosystem of credibility and long-term growth potential.
Capital Requirements
A fundamental requirement for migration to the Main Board is the maintenance of an adequate paid-up capital. As per the guidelines of SEBI and leading stock exchanges such as NSE and BSE, the post-migration paid-up capital of the company should generally be ?10 crore or more. This ensures that only companies with a significant financial base are permitted to enter the Main Board, thereby protecting investor interests and maintaining the quality of listed entities. The higher capital threshold acts as a filter against very small enterprises that may lack the financial strength to sustain Main Board obligations. Moreover, a higher capital base demonstrates financial stability, the capacity to absorb business risks, and readiness for broader investor participation.
Financial Track Record
In addition to capital requirements, companies must demonstrate consistent financial performance. Typically, the eligibility criteria require the company to have a track record of profitability for the preceding three financial years. Alternatively, in cases where profitability is inconsistent, companies may qualify by meeting the minimum net worth requirement prescribed by the exchanges. This ensures that only businesses with a proven operational history and financial soundness are allowed to migrate. By insisting on profitability or net worth, regulators safeguard against speculative or unstable businesses entering the Main Board, where the stakes for investors are much higher. The requirement also ensures that the migrating company is capable of sustaining compliance costs and investor expectations in the long run.
Corporate Governance Norms
Migration is not solely dependent on financials it also requires adherence to strict corporate governance standards. A migrating company must restructure its Board composition to include independent directors as per SEBI (LODR) Regulations, 2015. Further, the company must constitute statutory committees such as the Audit Committee, Nomination and Remuneration Committee, and Stakeholders’ Relationship Committee. These committees ensure transparency, accountability, and effective oversight over the company’s affairs. Strengthened governance structures build investor confidence and align the company with global best practices. For SMEs, this often requires organizational upgrades, including improved internal controls, detailed disclosures, and ethical decision-making practices, thereby preparing them for life on the Main Board.
Regulatory Compliance
A company seeking migration must demonstrate a clean record in terms of statutory and regulatory compliance. It should not have committed any major violations under SEBI regulations, the Companies Act, 2013, or exchange rules in the preceding years. This includes timely filing of annual returns, financial statements, adherence to disclosure requirements, and payment of statutory dues. Companies facing serious litigation, regulatory penalties, or repeated defaults may face rejection of their migration application. The rationale behind this criterion is to ensure that only companies with a culture of compliance and responsible conduct are permitted to access the wider investor base of the Main Board. Maintaining a strong compliance history assures investors of the company’s credibility and its ability to honor corporate responsibilities.
Board and Shareholders’ Approval
The migration process begins with an internal decision-making stage. The Board of Directors of the company must first pass a resolution approving the proposal for migration from the SME Exchange to the Main Board. This resolution demonstrates that the management has considered the implications of migration and agrees to proceed with the transition. Following this, approval of the shareholders is mandatory. A special resolution must be passed through postal ballot or e-voting, in accordance with the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 and SEBI regulations. This ensures that the decision is taken with the consent of the majority of stakeholders and reflects the collective will of the owners of the company. Without this approval, the application cannot be advanced to the exchange.
Application to Exchange
Once the approvals are obtained, the company is required to file an application with the SME Exchange on which it is currently listed. This application must be supported by a comprehensive set of documents, including audited financial statements, compliance certificates, and due diligence reports issued by a merchant banker. The due diligence process verifies the accuracy of disclosures, the financial soundness of the company, and compliance with regulatory norms. The application serves as the official request by the company to shift to the Main Board and must be prepared with utmost accuracy and completeness, as any deficiency may lead to delays or rejection.
Examination and No Objection Certificate (NOC)
Upon receiving the application, the SME Exchange conducts a detailed examination of compliance records, financial disclosures, and corporate governance practices of the applicant company. The exchange ensures that the company meets the eligibility criteria laid down by SEBI and the exchange itself. If satisfied, the SME Exchange issues a No Objection Certificate (NOC), certifying that the company has complied with the rules and regulations of the SME platform and is eligible to migrate to the Main Board. The issuance of an NOC is a critical step, as it acts as a green signal for further processing of the application by the Main Board exchange.
Final Approval and Listing
After obtaining the NOC from the SME Exchange, the application is forwarded to the Main Board exchange (BSE or NSE). The Main Board then undertakes its own verification process, reviewing the company’s compliance with SEBI’s regulations, including the SEBI (ICDR) Regulations, 2018, and SEBI (LODR) Regulations, 2015. If the exchange is satisfied with the company’s financial stability, governance standards, and legal compliance, it grants final approval for migration. Upon approval, the company’s securities are listed on the Main Board, and trading commences under the new platform. From this stage onwards, the company is subject to stricter disclosure norms, governance requirements, and regulatory oversight applicable to Main Board entities.
Corporate Approvals
The foundation of the migration application lies in obtaining the proper corporate approvals. Certified copies of the Board resolution authorizing the initiation of migration, as well as the special resolution passed by shareholders, must be submitted along with the application. These approvals demonstrate that the company’s governing body and its ultimate owners have formally sanctioned the shift from the SME Exchange to the Main Board. The resolutions also serve as evidence of compliance with the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013, ensuring that the decision to migrate is legally valid and taken in accordance with corporate law requirements.
Financial Disclosures
The company must furnish its audited financial statements for the preceding three financial years. These financials must include the balance sheet, profit and loss account, cash flow statements, schedules, and notes to accounts, along with the auditor’s report. Such disclosures enable regulators and exchanges to assess the company’s financial strength, consistency in performance, and overall eligibility for Main Board listing. The submission of financial disclosures ensures transparency and allows investors to make informed decisions. Furthermore, the financials must be in compliance with applicable accounting standards and audited by a statutory auditor holding a valid certificate of practice.
Due Diligence Reports
An important requirement of migration is the submission of a due diligence certificate issued by a merchant banker or practicing company secretary. The due diligence process involves a thorough review of the company’s financial, legal, and regulatory compliances to confirm that it meets SEBI and exchange guidelines. The certificate acts as an assurance to the SME Exchange and subsequently the Main Board exchange that the company has been independently verified for compliance with listing regulations. It covers aspects such as shareholding pattern, pending litigations, related-party transactions, and statutory filings. This document adds credibility to the application and provides regulators with confidence in the company’s eligibility.
Other Disclosures
Apart from approvals, financials, and due diligence, the company must also provide a series of additional disclosures. These include the shareholding pattern, indicating the distribution of shares between promoters, institutional investors, and the public. Details of material litigations or defaults must also be disclosed, as these could impact investor decision-making. Further, proof of corporate governance compliance, such as Board composition and functioning of committees, is required. If necessary, the company must also file its updated Memorandum and Articles of Association, particularly if amendments were made to align with Main Board norms. Together, these disclosures provide a comprehensive picture of the company’s operations, compliance culture, and governance framework, ensuring that the migration application is transparent and legally sound.
Due Diligence
The first and foremost responsibility of a merchant banker in the migration process is to conduct comprehensive due diligence on the applicant company. This includes reviewing the company’s financial performance, legal compliance, corporate governance practices, and regulatory history. The merchant banker verifies the accuracy of disclosures made in the financial statements, checks for pending litigations, and ensures compliance with SEBI and exchange regulations. This process provides assurance that the company is eligible to migrate to the Main Board and that its disclosures to regulators and investors are reliable. Due diligence is critical because any misstatement or concealment of information could lead to rejection of the migration application or regulatory penalties at a later stage.
Preparation of Application
Merchant bankers play a central role in the drafting and preparation of the migration application. They are responsible for compiling and organizing the required documentation, including corporate approvals, audited financials, compliance certificates, and disclosure statements. The application must be precise, complete, and compliant with the formats prescribed by the SME Exchange and the Main Board Exchange. The merchant banker also ensures that the application is supported by a due diligence certificate confirming adherence to SEBI regulations. By preparing a structured and compliant application, the merchant banker reduces the risk of delays or queries during the scrutiny process and facilitates a smooth transition to the Main Board.
Regulatory Liaison
A merchant banker acts as a vital intermediary between the company and regulatory authorities, including SEBI, the SME Exchange, and the Main Board Exchange. During the course of migration, queries or clarifications may be raised by the exchanges or SEBI regarding disclosures, compliance, or eligibility. The merchant banker communicates these queries to the company, ensures proper responses are prepared, and submits them within the prescribed timelines. Their role as a regulatory liaison ensures that the company’s interests are effectively represented, and compliance issues are addressed in a timely and professional manner. This role is particularly important because exchanges rely heavily on the merchant banker’s certification and representations while evaluating migration applications.
Advisory Support
In addition to their compliance and regulatory functions, merchant bankers provide critical advisory support during the migration process. They guide the company on matters such as corporate governance upgrades, investor communication, and Board restructuring to meet Main Board norms. Merchant bankers also advise on valuation matters and capital structure, ensuring that the company is positioned attractively for institutional investors post-migration. Their expertise extends beyond the migration itself, as they assist in preparing the company for life on the Main Board, where compliance obligations and investor scrutiny are much higher. This advisory role adds strategic value, helping the company to not only migrate but also sustain its performance in the larger market.
Applicability of SEBI ICDR
The SEBI (Issue of Capital and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2018 (commonly referred to as SEBI ICDR) govern the framework for raising capital and listing of securities in India. In the context of migration, these regulations prescribe the eligibility criteria, disclosure obligations, and procedural requirements that a company must satisfy before being allowed to shift from an SME Exchange to the Main Board. The ICDR Regulations ensure that the company migrating to a wider and more sophisticated investor platform has the necessary financial strength, governance structures, and transparency. Provisions relating to minimum paid-up capital, net worth, profitability track record, and disclosures of risk factors form part of this regulatory framework. By enforcing these standards, SEBI ensures that only credible and financially stable companies access the Main Board, thereby protecting investor interests and maintaining the integrity of capital markets.
Applicability of LODR Regulations
Upon migration, the company automatically becomes subject to the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015 (LODR). These regulations impose stringent governance and compliance obligations that are more rigorous than those applicable to SME-listed entities. Companies must now comply with quarterly financial reporting requirements, maintain minimum public shareholding, and adhere to detailed disclosure norms for material events such as mergers, acquisitions, or changes in management. Additionally, LODR mandates the constitution of statutory committees such as the Audit Committee, Nomination and Remuneration Committee, and Stakeholders’ Relationship Committee, all with independent director participation. These measures are designed to enhance accountability, strengthen transparency, and safeguard minority shareholder interests. Compliance with LODR Regulations marks a significant shift in operational and governance practices for a company post-migration.
Exchange Circulars
In addition to SEBI’s overarching regulations, the stock exchanges themselves, such as BSE and NSE, issue specific circulars and operational guidelines governing the migration process. These circulars provide detailed instructions on the procedure to be followed, the format of applications, the list of documents required, and the fees payable. They also address compliance obligations, including timelines for submission of resolutions, due diligence certificates, and disclosures of litigation or defaults. Exchange circulars act as practical implementation guidelines complementing SEBI’s regulations, ensuring uniformity and clarity in the migration process. Companies are expected to stay updated with these circulars, as exchanges may issue revisions from time to time based on changes in market practices, legal interpretations, or regulatory directions. Compliance with both SEBI regulations and exchange-specific guidelines ensures a smooth and legally compliant transition to the Main Board.
Compliance Burden
One of the foremost challenges faced by companies migrating to the Main Board is the significant increase in compliance obligations. While SME Exchanges follow a relatively relaxed regime, Main Board listing brings the company under the full purview of the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015 (LODR). This entails forming an Audit Committee, Nomination and Remuneration Committee, and Stakeholders’ Relationship Committee with independent director participation. In addition, companies must implement a robust code for prevention of insider trading under SEBI (Prohibition of Insider Trading) Regulations, 2015. These changes often require organizational restructuring, appointment of qualified professionals, and enhanced compliance monitoring systems. For smaller enterprises, the transition from a flexible SME framework to a stricter Main Board regime can initially be overwhelming.
Financial Costs
The migration process also imposes a financial burden on the applicant company. Fees must be paid to the SME Exchange and the Main Board Exchange as part of the migration process. Professional charges are payable to merchant bankers, legal advisors, auditors, and company secretaries involved in due diligence, document preparation, and regulatory liaison. In some cases, companies may also need to incur expenses to upgrade their governance structures, such as appointing additional independent directors or implementing better reporting software. For SMEs with limited financial resources, these costs may appear substantial. However, while the upfront costs are unavoidable, they should be viewed as an investment that can yield long-term benefits in terms of liquidity, valuations, and access to institutional capital.
Regulatory Scrutiny
Another challenge of migration is the increased regulatory scrutiny that Main Board companies are subjected to. Once listed on the Main Board, companies must make continuous disclosures regarding financial results, shareholding patterns, and material events within prescribed timelines. SEBI and the stock exchanges actively monitor compliance, and failure to meet deadlines can attract penalties, trading suspensions, or reputational damage. Additionally, investor scrutiny is significantly higher, as institutional investors and analysts regularly track performance and governance practices of Main Board entities. This level of monitoring requires a company to maintain high levels of transparency and accountability at all times. For businesses not accustomed to such scrutiny, adapting to these expectations can be challenging.
Operational Preparedness
Migration also requires companies to enhance their operational systems and internal controls to effectively handle Main Board obligations. This includes upgrading financial reporting systems to generate timely and accurate quarterly results, strengthening internal audit functions, and ensuring compliance with corporate governance frameworks. Operational preparedness also extends to investor relations, as Main Board companies must establish mechanisms for addressing shareholder grievances and queries. Companies must therefore invest in technology, manpower, and processes to align with best practices in reporting and governance. Without adequate preparation, a company may struggle to meet the standards expected on the Main Board, potentially undermining investor confidence and market reputation.
Timeframe for Migration
The migration process from the SME Exchange to the Main Board is not instantaneous and typically requires three to six months for completion. The timeline depends upon several factors, including the company’s preparedness, accuracy of documentation, and the efficiency with which queries from the SME Exchange or the Main Board are addressed. The first phase obtaining Board and shareholders’ approvals may take a few weeks. Preparation of documents and due diligence certifications can take an additional one to two months. Thereafter, the SME Exchange and the Main Board conduct their own examinations before granting approval. Companies with robust compliance records and timely disclosures are likely to experience quicker approvals, while those with pending regulatory issues or incomplete documents may face significant delays. Hence, readiness and compliance discipline are critical determinants of the migration timeline.
Cost of Migration
Migration to the Main Board involves direct and indirect financial costs. Direct costs include statutory fees payable to the SME Exchange and the Main Board Exchange, charges for listing, and filing-related expenses. In addition, companies must engage professionals such as merchant bankers, legal advisors, auditors, and company secretaries, whose professional fees form a significant component of the migration cost. Indirect costs may arise from the need to restructure governance mechanisms for example, appointing additional independent directors, enhancing compliance systems, or implementing investor relations platforms. For smaller enterprises, these costs may appear burdensome, but they must be weighed against the benefits of enhanced visibility, improved liquidity, and access to institutional investors. Viewed from a long-term perspective, the costs are justified as they position the company for sustainable growth on a larger platform.
Planning and Budgeting
Given the time and expense involved, companies are strongly advised to undertake advance planning and budgeting before initiating the migration process. A well-prepared plan ensures that sufficient financial resources are allocated to meet statutory fees and professional charges without disrupting the company’s working capital requirements. Administrative resources, such as dedicated compliance teams or consultants, should also be engaged early to streamline documentation and ensure adherence to timelines. Failure to plan adequately can result in delays, cost overruns, or even rejection of the application by exchanges. Proper planning allows the company to approach migration as a strategic investment rather than a compliance burden, ensuring a smoother transition and long-term benefits for shareholders.
Financial Reporting
Upon migration to the Main Board, companies are subject to quarterly financial reporting obligations as mandated by the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015 (LODR). They must file unaudited or audited quarterly financial results in the prescribed format, accompanied by a limited review report issued by statutory auditors. These filings must be made within 45 days of the end of each quarter and published in national newspapers and on the company’s website. This requirement ensures transparency and provides investors with timely updates on the company’s performance. For companies transitioning from SME platforms where disclosure frequency is less stringent, the shift to quarterly reporting requires enhanced accounting systems, internal controls, and compliance oversight.
Corporate Governance
Post-migration, companies must adhere to the enhanced corporate governance standards applicable to Main Board entities. This includes the constitution of statutory committees such as the Audit Committee, Nomination and Remuneration Committee, and Stakeholders’ Relationship Committee. Independent directors must form a significant proportion of the Board, with at least one-third being independent in the case of public companies, and one woman director is mandatory under the Companies Act, 2013 and SEBI LODR. These measures are designed to ensure checks and balances in management, promote transparency, and protect the interests of minority shareholders. Companies migrating to the Main Board often need to restructure their Boards and governance practices to meet these heightened requirements.
Disclosures of Events
Another critical compliance requirement relates to timely disclosure of material events under Regulation 30 of SEBI LODR. Companies must promptly inform stock exchanges of any significant developments, such as mergers, acquisitions, change in management, restructuring, defaults, or major litigations. These disclosures must be clear, accurate, and timely, ensuring that investors and regulators are aware of events that could impact the company’s share price or overall market perception. Non-disclosure or delayed disclosure can attract penalties and erode investor trust. This obligation underscores the principle of continuous transparency and fair treatment of all stakeholders in the securities market.
Minimum Public Shareholding
Post-migration, companies must comply with the minimum public shareholding requirement of 25%, as stipulated under Rule 19A of the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Rules, 1957 and SEBI regulations. This rule ensures that a significant portion of shares is available for public trading, enhancing liquidity and investor participation. Promoter holding must be gradually reduced, if necessary, through methods such as offer for sale, rights issues, or further public offerings. Ensuring compliance with minimum public shareholding norms is critical, as any shortfall can result in regulatory action, including suspension of trading.
Investor Protection Mechanisms
Main Board companies are also required to establish robust investor protection mechanisms. This includes the setting up of grievance redressal systems, investor service centers, and compliance with SEBI (Prohibition of Insider Trading) Regulations, 2015. Companies must frame a Code of Conduct for Insider Trading, monitor trading activities of designated persons, and establish an internal compliance officer to oversee adherence. In addition, they must respond to investor complaints promptly through the SEBI SCORES platform and other exchange-mandated mechanisms. These obligations safeguard shareholder interests, enhance investor confidence, and strengthen the overall governance framework of the company.
.jpg "Migration To Main Board")
Compliance Calendar ®