Startup
Start Your Business
Private Limited Registration
Public Company Registration
OPC Pvt Ltd Registration
LLP Firm Registration
Section 8 Company Registration
Nidhi Company Registration
Insurance Company Registration
NBFC Company Registration
Producer Company Registration
Foreign Subsidiary Registration
Foreign Branch Office
Foreign Liaison Office
Foreign Project Office
Overseas Company Registration
Proprietorship Firm Registration
Partnership Firm Registration
Grow Your Business
GST Registration
MSME Registration(UDYAM)
Shop & Establishment Registration
Startup India Registration
ESI/PF Registration
IEC Code (Import Export)
Startup Consultation
Appoint Virtual CFO
Angel Funding/ VCs
Virtual Office Service
Due Diligence of Company
Business Development
Protect Your Business
Trademark Registration
Trademark Objection
Trademark Hearing
Trademark Opposition
Trademark Infringement
Trademark Renewal
Trademark Assignment
Trademark Withdrawal
Trademark Monitoring
Logo Design Service
Copyright Registration
Patent Registration
Exit Your Business
Close Company
Fast Track
Close LLP
Close Firm
GST Cancellation
Compliances
Change Services
Change Company Name
Change LLP Name
Change Company Object
Change LLP Object
Increase Authorised Capital
Increase Paid-up Capital
Increase LLP Capital
Transfer of Shares
Alteration in MoA & AoA
Resignation of Auditor
Appointment of Director
Resignation of Director
Change in Designation of Director
Shifting Registered Office of Company
Shifting Registered Office of LLP
Dormant Status of Company
Mandatory Compliances
Appoinment of Auditor
Annual Filings of Company
Annual Filings of LLP
Annual DIN/DPIN KYC
Annual Return of Deposits
Half Yearly MSME Return
Statutory Registers & Minutes
XBRL Filing of Companies
eStamping of Share Certificates
Dematerialisation of Shares
RBI FEMA Compliance
GST Returns Filing
ESI-EPF Returns Filing
TDS Returns Filing
Change in Structure
Proprietorship to OPC
OPC to Private Limited
Private Limited to OPC
LLP to Private Limited
Private Limited to LLP
Partnership Firm to LLP
Private Limited to Public Company
Public Company to Private Limited
Trust/Society to Section 8 Company
Existing Company to Section 8
Existing Section 8 to Company
Services
Accounting & Book Keeping
GST Compliance
Valuation Services
Corporate Litigation
Company Law Advisory
Services For Banks
Drafting & Vetting Services
Business Setup Advisory
Startups Funding
Business Loans
Get in Touch
Govt Liaisoning
Retainership Services
NBFC
NBFC Company Registration
NBFC Micro-Finance Registration
NBFC P2P Lending Registration
NBFC Core Investment Company
NBFC ROC Compliance
NBFC RBI Compliance
NBFC License Restoration
NBFC Business Plan
NBFC Acquisition
NBFC Consultancy
NBFC Compliance Calendar
NBFC Independent Director
ISO
ISO 9001:2015
Most Demanded
ISO 14001:2015
ISO 13485:2016
OHSAS 18001:2007
HACCP Certification
CE Marking
GMP Certification
CMMI Level 3 Certification
ISO 22000:2005
ISO 27001:2013
FSSAI
FSSAI Registration
FSSAI State License
FSSAI Central License
FSSAI Registration Renewal
FSSAI License Renewal
FSSAI Returns Filing
FSSAI Compliances
FSSAI Consultancy
ITR
Salaried Person
TDS Refund
Firms/LLPs
Companies
NGOs
Income Tax Notice
Income Tax Planning
Income Tax Litigation
Income Tax Computation
Charity
Section 8 Company
Recommended
Trust Registration
Society Registration
80G & 12A Registration
FCRA Registration
NITI Ayog Registration
CSR-1 Registration
CSR 2 Report
CSR Services
NGO Consultancy
NGO Handholding
Govt Grants Support
Partnership
Angel Investors
Venture Capitalists
Co-Working Spaces
Banks and NBFCs
Incubation Centres
Government Wings
Institutional Bodies
Software Companies
CA/CS/CMA/Lawyers
Press & Media Houses
Overseas Ventures
Other Startup Enablers
Contact Us
Home
Trademarks
Safeguarding Food Trademarks: Domino’s vs. Dominick Pizza ruling on Deceptive Similarity
Safeguarding Food Trademarks: Domino’s vs. Dominick Pizza ruling on Deceptive Similarity
Volume
1
Rate
1
Pitch
1
Safeguarding Food Trademarks: Domino’s vs. Dominick Pizza ruling on Deceptive Similarity. The growth of online platforms for food delivery has opened up new opportunities for food entrepreneurs in India. With this rise, investors are showing greater interest in the Indian food and beverage sector, leading to increased funding and the need for intellectual property rights protection for brands operating in the food industry in India. In this article, Compliance Calendar traces the case history and key takeaways of a landmark suit of trademark infringement involving Domino’s Pizza, while also highlighting the need to protect your trademarks in the food industry. Case title : Dominos IP Holder LLC & Another versus Ms Dominick Pizza & Another, CS (COMM) 587/2022 Brief Facts of the case The plaintiff - Domino’s Pizza The plaintiff in this case is the well-known brand Domino’s Pizza, a Limited Liability Corporation having its registered office in Michigan, USA. It owns the intellectual property including the trademarks “Domino’s Pizza”. They operate in India through an agreement with Jubilant Food Works Limited, which operates the Domino’s franchises in India. They also acquired rights over their distinctive blue and red logo. Domino’s is one of the world’s leading pizza and fast food restaurant chains, having expanded its operations to over 90 countries, with over 19,200 stores worldwide. The global retails sales figures of Domino’s aggregated over to US$ 17.8 billion in 2021 and US$ 4 billion in 2022. Globally, the plaintiffs work through the India centric website www.dominos.co.in. Through sales of their products, in India alone, the plaintiffs have earned, between 2011 and 2018, 13813.42 crores with 2916.8 crores having been earned in the year 2017-18 alone. The Defendant - Dominick Pizza The leading defendant in this case is a pizza brand operating under the name “Dominick Pizza”. They started operating under the website www.dominickpizza.com and a corresponding Facebook page. They also applied for a trademark registration for the same, but were denied the same by the Trademark Registry on grounds of similarity with the plaintiff’s marks. The original brand Domino’s noticed that their trademark was being infringed by Dominick pizza, by operating under this misleading name on Zomato. They were also actively franchising their outlets in locations in Delhi, Ghaziabad and Punjab. In their menu, some items offered by the plaintiff such as “Cheese Burst” and “Pasta Italiano” were also offered. Facts and Submissions that strengthened the case for the plaintiff, Domino’s Pizza - Key takeaways Distinctive logo and trademark registration: The plaintiff has globally used its distinctive red and blue logo, since the year 1965. Further, the same has been put to use in India since 1996. By virtue of being the owner of the said registered marks, the plaintiffs are entitled under Section 28(1)1 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 to protect itself against infringement of the said marks. Phonetic similarity that is likely to cause confusion: In order to prove the deceptive nature of an infringing mark, the courts look at the degree of resemblance between the two marks. This resemblance may be phonetic, visual or in the basic idea adopted by the Plaintiff’s mark. The court looked at the exact same phrasing involved in including “Cheese Burst” and “Pasta Italiano” by the defendants in their menu. Lack of registration of the defendant’s trademark - Any defendant not being a registered proprietor of the said trademark, stands in a vulnerable position in the court of law when it comes to defending use of a deceptive trademark. The Pianists test applied by the court to judge infringement by a deceptive trademark - Mere similarity between two marks does not, by default, result in a trademark infringement. The court looks at a classic test, called the “Pianist test” evolved in the United Kingdom to judge whether two marks that sound similar are deceptively similar. To determine this, the court states: “You must take the two words. You must judge them, both by their look and by their sound. You must consider the goods to which they are to be applied. You must consider the nature and kind of customer who would be likely to buy those goods. In fact, you must consider all the surrounding circumstances; and you must further consider what is likely to happen if each of those trademarks is used in a normal way as a trade mark for the goods of the respective owners of the marks. If, considering all those circumstances, you come to the conclusion that there will be a confusion—that is to say, not necessarily that one man will be injured and the other will gain illicit benefit, but that there will be a confusion in the mind of the public which will lead to confusion in the goods—then you may refuse the registration, or rather you must refuse the registration in that case.” Based on the test above, the court conclusively determined that the two marks - Domino’s and Dominick’s being phonetically similar can lead to confusion in the customer’s minds. More scrutiny required when trademarks relating to consumable items are involved - In this judgement, Justice Hari Shankar noted that “Running an eating house using a mark which is deceptively similar to a reputed mark does not speak well for the enterprise concerned. The intent to capitalize on the reputation of a known and established brand, by using a mark which is deceptively similar to the mark used by the brand, can, in a given case, give rise to a legitimate apprehension of quality compromise by the imitator. Courts have, therefore, to be vigilant in ensuring that, where the marks relate to consumable items or to enterprises such as hotels, restaurants and eating houses where consumable items are served to customers, such imitative attempts are not allowed to go unchecked.” Understanding the various reliefs offered by the Court in a suit involving trademark infringement Permanent Injunction In this case, the court granted relief in favor of Domino’s Pizza and passed a decree of permanent injunction against Dominick Pizza. This means that all proprietors, partners, directors, officers, servants, agents franchisers and all others acting for and on behalf of Dominick Pizza are barred from advertising, selling, offering for sale marketing etc. any product, packaging, menu cards and advertising material, labels, stationery articles, website or any other documentation using, depicting, displaying in any manner whatsoever, the marks “Dominick Pizza”. Transfer of all misleading domain names The court also directed to transfer, forthwith, the domain names www.dominickpizza.com and www.dominickpizzas.com to the plaintiff. This is helpful in plugging immediate losses and cautions the customers against the trademark infringement. Cost to the Litigants This court noted that an amount valued at 6,57,564.20 being the actual costs were incurred by the plaintiffs in the present litigation. Thus, the court ordered the defendants to pay the same as costs of litigation. For the latest updates on compliances applicable for the food industry, trademark filing, trademark registration for your food business, consult the legal resources available on our website at Compliance Calendar. You may also consult our in-house legal professionals to ensure that you have the most up-to-date advice on filing for trademarks and pursuing a case for trademark violation in India.
Share this article:
Search more articles:
You may also like
The Ultimate Guide: How to Register Your Brand Name in India
How to Reply Trademark Objection in Examination Report under Section 9 and 11
Trademark Opposition Process in India
Trademark Infringement: Meaning, Types, Examples and How to Avoid TM Infringement
Trademark Renewal Process in India
Trademark Assignment Process: Learn How to Transfer Trademark Ownership
Stages of Trademark Registration Status - The Complete Manual
Trademark Status- Send to Vienna Codification
Trademark Status- Formalities Chk Pass
Trademark Status- Formalities Chk Failed
Trademark Application Status- Marked For Exam
Trademark Status- Examination Report Issued
Trademark Status- Objected
Trademark Status- Ready for Show Cause Hearing
Trademark Status- Advertised Before Accepted
Trademark Status- Accepted
Trademark Status- Accepted and Advertised
Trademark Status- Refused
Trademark Status- Abandoned
Trademark Status- Withdrawn
Trademark Status- Opposed
Trademark Status- Registered
Trademark Status- Removed
Absolute Grounds of 'Distinctive' and 'Distinguish' Character under Section 9(1) (a) of the Trademarks Act, 1999
Analysis of Trademark Genericide: Meaning, Effects and ways to Protect
An analysis on the proviso of Section 9 (1) (b) of the Trademark Act, 1999
What is Assignment and Transmission in Trademark?
How to protect your brand name by filing a Trademark Application
How Startups can protect their brand / Logo in India and Government supports
List of New Trademark Forms in India as per the Trademark Rules, 2017
What is Class 99 of Trademark Application- Is it a good or bad decision?
How to file Counter Statement for Trademark Opposition?
What are well known Trademarks and How to obtain it?
What is the difference between TM and ®
Protecting Your Brand: A Step-by-Step Guide to Trademark Registration
Trademark Law: Protecting your brand identity
Trademark Registration Online: Protect your Business IP
Reply to Trademark Objection on Relative Grounds of Refusal: Section 11 of Trademarks Act, 1999
Exploring Non-Conventional Trademarks Under the Trade Marks Act, 1999
YAHOO INC VS. AKASH ARORA AND ANR - Does Domain Name Constitute Trademark Infringement?
Concept and Protection of Trade Dress in Trade Mark
IPR for Social Media Influencers- Here's all you need to know
Damages for Trademark Violation - Puma Se vs. Ashok Kumar | Delhi HC
Delhi High Court on (Non) Functioning of the Trademark Registry Website/Portal
Have you claimed Depreciation on your Brand Name? Here’s a Landmark Ruling to watch out
The Case Against Meesho: Why E-Commerce Portals Must Ensure Complete Disclosure of Sellers Details
Special Drive Initiative to Expedite Pending Trademark Applications
Difference Between Trademark and Service Mark
Importance of Using Trademarks to Maintain Applicability in Indian Law
International Non-Proprietary Names (INN) and Trademark Laws in India
Process of Rectification of Trademark in India
Role of Trademark Attorneys in Trademark Registration
Why is Trademark Registration for Startups and Small Businesses Necessary?
A Battle Between the Coca-Cola Company v. Bisleri International Pvt. Ltd. For Trademark Infringement
Delhi High Court Rules in Favor of Google in Trademark Infringement Case
No Monopoly Can Be Claimed for Words of Common English Usage
Common Mistakes to Avoid When Choosing a Trademark for Your Brand
Brewed Trademark Infringement Case of Starbucks Vs Sardarbuksh
Exploring the Concept of 'Deceptive Similarity' in Trademarks Law
Why Filing of Evidence Before the Registrar of Trademarks is Crucial?
Rise of Domain Names as Trademarks in the Digital World
Concept of Passing Off in Indian Trade Mark Law
Evolution of Trademark Laws in India
Important of Power of Attorney (POA) in Trademark Filing
Trademark Issues in Co-branding and Collaborations
Trademark Enforcement Strategies for Online Marketplaces and Platforms
Trademarking Financial Services in the Fintech Industry
Interplay of Trademarks and Artificial Intelligence in the Modern Digitalized Era
Who can register a trademark in India?
Trademark Status- Protection Granted
Trademark Case Law: Sterling Agro Industries Limited v. ASR Trading Company
Registration of Color Trademark in India Under Trademarks Act, 1999
Trademarking Sustainable Tourism
Trademark Protection for NGOs / Non-Profit Organizations in India
Role of the USPTO in Trademark Registration
How to know the Trademark Status for Trademark Registration in India
Can a person trademark their own name in India?
Trademark Strategies for Startups - A Complete Guide
Supporting Documents Required for Attending Trademark Hearing in India
How to fight Trademark Infringement bonafide if your mark is different?
When to file for Trademark Abandoned Status as an Applicant?
Trademark Registration Online: The Complete Process and Cost
Extent of exclusivity granted over the shape of a product by trademark registration in India
Process of Trademark Withdrawal in India
Should Trademark Logo (Device) be filed in colour or black and white (grey)?
Bearing the Burden of Common Use in Trademark Ownership
Start Your Business
Private Limited Registration
Public Company Registration
OPC Pvt Ltd Registration
LLP Firm Registration
Section 8 Company Registration
Nidhi Company Registration
Insurance Company Registration
NBFC Company Registration
Producer Company Registration
Foreign Subsidiary Registration
Foreign Branch Office
Foreign Liaison Office
Foreign Project Office
Overseas Company Registration
Proprietorship Firm Registration
Partnership Firm Registration
Grow Your Business
GST Registration
MSME Registration(UDYAM)
Shop & Establishment Registration
Startup India Registration
ESI/PF Registration
IEC Code (Import Export)
Startup Consultation
Appoint Virtual CFO
Angel Funding/ VCs
Virtual Office Service
Due Diligence of Company
Business Development
Protect Your Business
Trademark Registration
Trademark Objection
Trademark Hearing
Trademark Opposition
Trademark Infringement
Trademark Renewal
Trademark Assignment
Trademark Withdrawal
Trademark Monitoring
Logo Design Service
Copyright Registration
Patent Registration
Exit Your Business
Close Company
Fast Track
Close LLP
Close Firm
GST Cancellation
Change Services
Change Company Name
Change LLP Name
Change Company Object
Change LLP Object
Increase Authorised Capital
Increase Paid-up Capital
Increase LLP Capital
Transfer of Shares
Alteration in MoA & AoA
Resignation of Auditor
Appointment of Director
Resignation of Director
Change in Designation of Director
Shifting Registered Office of Company
Shifting Registered Office of LLP
Dormant Status of Company
Mandatory Compliances
Appoinment of Auditor
Annual Filings of Company
Annual Filings of LLP
Annual DIN/DPIN KYC
Annual Return of Deposits
Half Yearly MSME Return
Statutory Registers & Minutes
XBRL Filing of Companies
eStamping of Share Certificates
Dematerialisation of Shares
RBI FEMA Compliance
GST Returns Filing
ESI-EPF Returns Filing
TDS Returns Filing
Change in Structure
Proprietorship to OPC
OPC to Private Limited
Private Limited to OPC
LLP to Private Limited
Private Limited to LLP
Partnership Firm to LLP
Private Limited to Public Company
Public Company to Private Limited
Trust/Society to Section 8 Company
Existing Company to Section 8
Existing Section 8 to Company
Services
Accounting & Book Keeping
GST Compliance
Valuation Services
Corporate Litigation
Company Law Advisory
Services For Banks
Drafting & Vetting Services
Startups Funding
Business Loans
Get in Touch
NBFC
NBFC Company Registration
NBFC Micro-Finance Registration
NBFC P2P Lending Registration
NBFC Core Investment Company
NBFC ROC Compliance
NBFC RBI Compliance
NBFC License Restoration
NBFC Business Plan
NBFC Acquisition
NBFC Consultancy
NBFC Compliance Calendar
NBFC Independent Director
ISO
ISO 9001:2015
ISO 14001:2015
ISO 13485:2016
OHSAS 18001:2007
HACCP Certification
CE Marking
GMP Certification
CMMI Level 3 Certification
ISO 22000:2005
ISO 27001:2013
FSSAI
FSSAI Registration
FSSAI State License
FSSAI Central License
FSSAI Registration Renewal
FSSAI License Renewal
FSSAI Returns Filing
FSSAI Compliances
FSSAI Consultancy
ITR
Salaried Person
Firms/LLPs
Companies
NGOs
Income Tax Notice
Income Tax Planning
Income Tax Litigation
Charity
Section 8 Company
Trust Registration
Society Registration
80G & 12A Registration
FCRA Registration
NITI Ayog Registration
CSR-1 Registration
CSR 2 Report
CSR Services
NGO Consultancy
NGO Handholding
Govt Grants Support
Partnership
Angel Investors
Venture Capitalists
Co-Working Spaces
Banks and NBFCs
Incubation Centres
Government Wings
Institutional Bodies
Software Companies
CA/CS/CMA/Lawyers
Press & Media Houses
Overseas Ventures
Other Startup Enablers
Contact Us